Immigration debate Essay

The Development, Relief and bringing up for Alien Minors defend ( daydream Act), is a proposed bipartisan legislation that is meant to let amnesty and computer backup for many young persons who came to the US unwillingly. Senator Orin Harten (R-UT) and Senator Richard Durbin (D-lL) pioneered this legislation. (Dreamact. info) Although a republican is involved in pioneering this legislation, the majority of the party has strongly rejected the ideate Act. The DREAM Act is a visor that would go turn up certain punishable and deportable alien students who graduate from US high schools, who ar of good honourable character, arrived in the U.S. bootlegly as minors, and keep up been in the country always and illegally for at least five geezerhood prior to the heights enactment, the luck to earn conditional permanent residency if they plump two years in the military or two years at a four year institution of higher learning. (Debatepedia. org). The conditions of the bill are that the persons must have entered the country before the age of 16 and one also must be between the ages of 12-35 to qualify.This Act is meant to provide a solution to around two meg undocumented immigrants of the 11. 5 that are currently living in the US. Ill. The Debate An Economic probability Republicans have been reluctant to afford illegal aliens any type of relief regardless of the terra firmas they are here. As a New York Times pillar puts it, Republican politicians have overwhelmingly embraced an approach to immigration reform that offers nevertheless misery, arrest and punishment to the undocumented. NY Times, Editorial) This hard line approach solitary(prenominal) baffles many considering how crucial a role the immigration debate has been in the recent presidential election and has left the Republican Party out of favor with many of the Latino voters. Republicans have made it extremely tall(prenominal) to pass the DREAM Act, a reform that can help abet a very bi g problem in the US. They have provided close to good arguments against the DREAM Act, such as how it would entice parents to bring their children here illegally. However, like in any debate, the bottom line is whether it is economically efficacious or not.After analyzing both sides of the debate, I have no reason to believe that it is not. The DREAM Act might actually be what our suffer economy needs. As a recent report by the capital of the United States Post claimed that, The Center for American Progress report, ased on data from the American Community Survey, says that passing the DREAM Act for the estimated eligible 2. 1 million youth would add $329 billion and 1. 4 million passing the DREAM Act will create a more competitive product line market, something that would lead to an increase in unemployment rate.Besides the fact that we are a capitalist society that is built off competition, it is also these same Republicans who are crying foul about competition that argue for a more free capitalistic economic system. We need to look at these illegal immigrants as assets to our country, rather han treat them as criminals. Those eligible for the DREAM Act can provide so much to the economy if they were granted the opportunity to do so. It isnt like they are going anywhere and, they have adopted so many American values into their lives.By bragging(a) them the amnesty they need and arguable deserve, our economy can only benefit. The judicature can generate more tax revenue from them, thus oddment the outcry that they dont pay tax. Also by self-aggrandizing them the same rights as citizens in the job market, they will be give what they deserve thus possibly stimulating consumer spending by them. V. goal Democrats seem to be the party that is trying to solve the immigration aftermath here in the US. They have advocated hard for the passing of the DREAM Act, a legislation that I believe needs to and must be passed.