Oia Bible Paper Mark 2:23-28

raw(a) Testa ment Survey O-I-A Gospels/Acts Throughout the book of look into, several themes ar found to be pre move which address the legitimacy of savior. Multiple measure saviour actions prove He is who He says He is, although through His attempts to brood His identity from the public, people still atomic number 18 in disbelief to the highest degree His identity. The periscope of the Sabbath helps to explain this. The periscope on the Sabbath according to Mark is found in Mark chapter 2 poetrys 23 through 28 23One Sabbath saviour was going through the grainfields, and as his disciples walked along, they began to pick some heads of grain. 4The Pharisees verbalise to him, Look, why are they doing what is unlawful on the Sabbath? 25He answered, discombobul induct you never read what David did when he and his companions were hungry and in need? 26In the day judgment of convictions of Abiathar the high priest, he entered the house of God and ate the blessed scrawl, wh ich is lawful wholly for priests to eat. And he also gave some to his companions. 27Then he said to them, The Sabbath was do for man, not man for the Sabbath. 28So the Son of Man is cleric point of the Sabbath. My own brain of this periscope is reworded like this 23 One day on the Sabbath, delivery boy was go amongst His disciples through a field of gain. As they made their way, the disciples began to pick the heads of grain. 24 The Pharisees confronted Jesus and researched Him as to why the disciples were breaking the law of Sabbath rest. 25 Jesus replied, Do you recognize what David and his fri final stages did when they were hungry? 26 Let me tell you, they entered the erect of God during the days of Abiathar the high priest and ate the holy breadstuff in front of Abiathar himselfYou all know that the holy bread is only able to be eaten by the priests themselves 27 Jesus told the Pharisees, I am the Son of Man. The Sabbath was made for man. 28 Therefore the Son of Ma n is nonetheless Lord over the Sabbath. Multiple observations are obvious throughout the passage. To swallow with, it is credited several times how the setting of the story is occurring on the Sabbath, which is a day of rest. It is mentioned how Jesus and the disciples are present in the grainfields and the Pharisees are there with them.The Pharisees end up questioning Jesus about the disciples actions. Jesus defends them with an allusion of David in the time of Abiathar. There are countless numbers of interpretations that can be made throughout this short passage. These deal with the actions of the disciples, Jesus confrontation by the Pharisees, Jesus allusion to Davids actions in the time frame noted and the meaning female genital organ the consecrated bread. The disciples action of picking heads of grain was completely lawful, even though the Pharisees challenged it (Lane 114).In that time, people followed the Mosaic Law which stated, when you come into your neighbors stand up grain, then you may pluck it with your conks, but you shall not bring a sickle to you neighbors standing grain which is found in Deuteronomy chapter 23 verse 25. The only grounds that the Pharisees had to challenge the disciples were because it occurred on the Sabbath (Lane 115). Their actions could be seen as reaping which was command on the Sabbath by the Mosaic Law in Exodus chapter 34 verse 21. This violates the Sabbath because it is considered work.It was also noticed how the Pharisees question Jesus about the Disciples actions kinda of question them personally. When someone was considered a teacher it meant that they were responsible for those under them, so Jesus was responsible for the disciples (Keener 142). This is the reasoning Pharisees specifically questioned Jesus directly. It was seizee in order to satisfy the legal requirement of a warning foregoing to the prosecution for Sabbath violation (Lane 115). It is also important to understand Jesus allusion to I Sa muel chapter 21 verses 1 through 6. 1 David went to Nob, to Ahimelek the priest.Ahimelek trembled when he met him, and asked, Why are you alone? Why is no one with you? 2David answered Ahimelek the priest, The king sent me on a mission and said to me, No one is to know anything about the mission I am sending you on. As for my men, I discombobulate told them to meet me at a certain place. 3 presently then, what do you oblige on hand? Give me five loaves of bread, or whatever you can find. 4But the priest answered David, I dont have any ordinary bread on hand however, there is some consecrated bread hereprovided the men have kept themselves from women. 5David replied, Indeed women have been kept from us, as vernacular whenever I set out. The mens bodies are holy even on missions that are not holy. How much more so immediately 6So the priest gave him the consecrated bread, since there was no bread there except the bread of the Presence that had been removed from before the Lord and replaced by hot bread on the day it was taken away. match to Cole, Abiathar was Ahimeleks son who survived the priestly slaying at Nob in I Samuel chapter 22 (129).Abiathar served as high priest and was better know in association with David than his father, so this is known as a green error could have entered tradition before it became known to Mark (Lane 115). other interesting thing about the David reference is Jesus summary of the consecrated bread. He mentions in Mark chapter 2 verse 26 how David and his men ate the consecrated bread, which is lawful only for priests to eat. It is interesting to compare twain passages when is mentions the restrictions of who is eligible to eat the bread.In I Samuel chapter 21 verses 4 through 6, it is mention that the requirement is for men to have kept themselves from women. One interesting question that Lane brings to light is the actual connection between what is happening in the grain fields and the reference that Jesus makes in lig ht of the smudge (116). The incident in the grain fields specifically deals with the Sabbath while the allusion that Jesus makes, highlights the fact that God does not condemn David for his actions. This shows how the Pharisees interpretation of the Law was not in accordance with the scripture (117).This can be applied to the biblical apprehension of the Pharisees and others in that time period. Many people misinterpreted the textbook and often even twisted them to have a meaning that applied to their federal agency. The or so important thing that I learned from this scripture is the importance of understanding the background information behind the scripture. I must admit that in this case, I would be no different that a Pharisee. Although I have read this passage and heard it referenced multiple times, I have never fully understood Jesus allusion within the text and how it applies to the situation at hand.I am constantly guilty of skimming over text or not reading it on a le vel fatheaded enough to fully understand the message behind the words. This has been a lesson in itself. Works Cited Page Cole, R Alan. The Gospel check to Mark. Grand Rapids William B. Eerdman, 1989. Print. The holy parole New International Version. Grand Rapids Zondervan, 1984. Print Keener, Craig S. The IVP Bible Background Commentary New Testament. Downers Grove Intervarsity Press, 1993. Print Lane, William L. The Gospel According to Mark. Grand Rapids William B. Eerdman, 1974. Print.