Sunday, February 17, 2019
Why Did He Do It? :: essays research papers fc
What would you do, or how would you feel, if a man of middle-eastern descent came up to you sexual relation you that he had been a victim of a despise crime where he was attacked from behind, beaten and pelted with eggs while his assailants uttered racial epithets, but subsequently was nonified that it was all a lie, a hoax? Well, there was a soul that had to deal with this dilemma. Arizona State University junior Ahmad Sadd Nasim performed this gruesome wreak, and now the Maricopa Attorneys Office, and the ASU disciplinal department, must decide whether or not to press charges on this act of pusillanimity. It is believed by many that Nasim should face charges in order to go away trustworthy victims of hate crimes to come forward without shame, prevent a approach in hate crimes, and also prevent further acts of this nature.     In order to allow the victims of true hate crimes to identify themselves without fear of not being heard, or believed, Ahmad Sa ad Nasim should be prosecuted. If he is not prosecuted, the victims of future hate crimes may not choose to come forward. Furthermore, these victims would find it nothing more than a pay off of their time if they tried to report the perpetrators. Senior Vikesh Desai said," the lie hurts victims of genuine hate crimes." He continues, "Its like the boy who cried wolf. Now if another person is attacked in a hate crime, more people are going to research it. People are going to be afraid to speak up because theyll think that people wont believe them." (Chiu 1). However, if Nasim is prosecuted, and convicted, this type of situation would not be a problem. Consequently, the number of hate crimes committed will decline.     The chance of an append in the number of hate crimes committed relies partially on whether or not the Maricopa County Attorneys Office decides to press charges on Nasim. The number of performed hate crimes could rise if Nasim is not prosecuted for his wrong-doings. People that are prejudiced against Middle-Eastern immigrants, especially in start out of previous events (WTC & Pentagon attacks), might find this as "open placate" on committing hate crimes. Figuring that if the victims went to authorities they would not be believed anyway, they would be fearless. "... people werent taking hate crimes seriously..." said Desai (Chiu 2). Therefore, the chances of them being caught are scale down to none.